| Age | Commit message (Expand) | Author |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-10-22 | Okay, the solver is now correct....It runs in two separate passes: - improve strategy (for all) - evaluate fixpoint Unfortunately this loses out on locality at the moment. I really want a local solver, so I'll have to see what I can do about that. | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-10-15 | ... Assert needs some includes. | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-10-15 | Fix up to build with clang (and fix another bug)...- Remove exceptions - Remove dynamic casts The bug was relating to MaxStrategy not cleaning up the influence sets after propagating changes. I just added a call to .clear() and it seems fine. | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-09-20 | Remove exceptions and C++11 features for LLVM. | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-08-07 | Merge complete! Get onto the right branch. | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-07-09 | Fix a few bugs and add a new example system. | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-06-15 | Parameterise fixpoint and strategy improvement...(command-line arguments specify which to use) Also: - Fix up Complete<T> to work comparing `inf` to 1 (stupid bug) - Clean up the systems/ folder a bit - Change the printed output to differentiate variables and constants (!v/!c, respectively) - Perform a slight optimisation to the strategy-iteration process | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-06-15 | Re-write heaps of code to work better. | Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-05-28 | Fix memory error and x = max(-inf, expr) stuff. | Carlo Zancanaro |
 |
index : honours | |
| My honours project from 2012. | Carlo |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |