| Age | Commit message (Expand) | Author |
|---|
| 2012-10-22 | Okay, the solver is now correct....It runs in two separate passes:
- improve strategy (for all)
- evaluate fixpoint
Unfortunately this loses out on locality at the moment.
I really want a local solver, so I'll have to see what I can do about
that.
| Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-08-07 | A whole bunch of clean up work around the place....- Make it a bit nicer to use the command-line
- Remove the strategies we won't be using
- Clean up some code around the place, generally
| Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-08-06 | New variation on the equation system solver....Much simpler to understand. Basically have a variable assignment which
is dynamic and updates with the strategy changes. Similarly have
strategy changes easily invalidate the variable assignment.
This makes them strongly inter-dependent, but simplifies the
implementation considerably. Proving it should be easier like this, too.
| Carlo Zancanaro |
| 2012-07-10 | Simple test stuff - examples from the paper | Carlo Zancanaro |
