diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.mem.enum')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.mem.enum/p1.cpp | 152 |
1 files changed, 152 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.mem.enum/p1.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.mem.enum/p1.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f8cc009 --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class/temp.mem.enum/p1.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -verify %s + +template<typename T> struct A { + enum E : T; // expected-note {{here}} + E v; + E f() { return A::e1; } // expected-error {{no member named 'e1' in 'A<T>'}} + E g() { return E::e1; } + E h(); +}; + +A<int> a; +A<int>::E a0 = A<int>().v; +int n = A<int>::E::e1; // expected-error {{implicit instantiation of undefined member}} + +template<typename T> enum A<T>::E : T { e1, e2 }; + +// FIXME: Now that A<T>::E is defined, we are supposed to inject its enumerators +// into the already-instantiated class A<T>. This seems like a really bad idea, +// though, so we don't implement that, but what we do implement is inconsistent. +// +// Either do as the standard says, or only include enumerators lexically defined +// within the class in its scope. +A<int>::E a1 = A<int>::e1; // expected-error {{no member named 'e1' in 'A<int>'}} + +A<char>::E a2 = A<char>::e2; + +template<typename T> typename A<T>::E A<T>::h() { return e2; } +A<short>::E a3 = A<short>().h(); + + +template<typename T> struct B { + enum class E; + E v; + E f() { return E::e1; } + E g(); +}; + +B<int> b; +B<int>::E b0 = B<int>().v; + +template<typename T> enum class B<T>::E { e1, e2 }; +B<int>::E b1 = B<int>::E::e1; + +B<char>::E b2 = B<char>::E::e2; + +template<typename T> typename B<T>::E B<T>::g() { return e2; } +B<short>::E b3 = B<short>().g(); + + +// Enumeration members of class templates can be explicitly specialized. For +// unscoped enumerations, specializations must be defined before the primary +// template is, since otherwise the primary template will be implicitly +// instantiated when we parse the nested name specifier. +template<> enum A<long long>::E : long long { e3, e4 }; // expected-error {{explicit specialization of 'E' after instantiation}} expected-note {{first required here}} + +template<> enum class B<long long>::E { e3, e4 }; +B<long long>::E b4 = B<long long>::E::e4; + +B<long>::E b5; +template<> enum class B<long>::E { e5 }; +void fb5() { b5 = decltype(b5)::e5; } +B<long>::E b6 = B<long>::E::e5; + + +template<typename T> struct C { + enum class E : T; +}; + +template<> enum class C<long long>::E : long long { e3, e4 }; +C<long long>::E c0 = C<long long>::E::e3; + +C<long>::E c1; +template<> enum class C<long>::E : long { e5 }; +void fc1() { c1 = decltype(c1)::e5; } +C<long>::E c2 = C<long>::E::e5; + +template<> enum class C<int>::E : int { e6 }; +template<typename T> enum class C<T>::E : T { e0 }; +C<int>::E c3 = C<int>::E::e6; +C<int>::E c4 = C<int>::E::e0; // expected-error {{no member named 'e0' in 'C<int>::E'}} + + +// Enumeration members can't be partially-specialized. +template<typename T> enum class B<T*>::E { e5, e6 }; // expected-error {{nested name specifier for a declaration cannot depend on a template parameter}} + + +// Explicit specializations can be forward-declared. +template<typename T> +struct D { + enum class E { e1 }; +}; +template<> enum class D<int>::E; +D<int>::E d1 = D<int>::E::e1; // expected-error {{incomplete type 'D<int>::E'}} +template<> enum class D<int>::E { e2 }; +D<int>::E d2 = D<int>::E::e2; +D<char>::E d3 = D<char>::E::e1; // expected-note {{first required here}} +D<char>::E d4 = D<char>::E::e2; // expected-error {{no member named 'e2'}} +template<> enum class D<char>::E { e3 }; // expected-error {{explicit specialization of 'E' after instantiation}} + +template<> enum class D<short>::E; +struct F { + // Per C++11 [class.friend]p3, these friend declarations have no effect. + // Only classes and functions can be friends. + template<typename T> friend enum D<T>::E; + template<> friend enum D<short>::E; + + template<> friend enum D<double>::E { e3 }; // expected-error {{cannot define a type in a friend declaration}} + +private: + static const int n = 1; // expected-note {{private here}} +}; +template<> enum class D<short>::E { + e = F::n // expected-error {{private member}} +}; + +class Access { + friend class X; + + template<typename T> + class Priv { + friend class X; + + enum class E : T; + }; + + class S { + typedef int N; // expected-note {{here}} + static const int k = 3; // expected-note {{here}} + + friend class Priv<char>; + }; + + static const int k = 5; +}; + +template<> enum class Access::Priv<Access::S::N>::E + : Access::S::N { // expected-error {{private member}} + a = Access::k, // ok + b = Access::S::k // expected-error {{private member}} +}; + +template<typename T> enum class Access::Priv<T>::E : T { + c = Access::k, + d = Access::S::k +}; + +class X { + Access::Priv<int>::E a = Access::Priv<int>::E::a; + Access::Priv<char>::E c = Access::Priv<char>::E::d; + // FIXME: We should see an access error for this enumerator. + Access::Priv<short>::E b = Access::Priv<short>::E::d; +}; |