2 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class.spec/temp.class.spec.mfunc/p1-neg.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class.spec/temp.class.spec.mfunc/p1-neg.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..59253db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class.spec/temp.class.spec.mfunc/p1-neg.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+template<typename T, int N>
+struct A;
+
+template<typename T> // expected-note{{previous template declaration}}
+struct A<T*, 2> {
+  void f0();
+  void f1();
+  void f2();
+};
+
+template<>
+struct A<int, 1> {
+  void g0();
+};
+
+// FIXME: We should probably give more precise diagnostics here, but the
+// diagnostics we give aren't terrible.
+// FIXME: why not point to the first parameter that's "too many"?
+template<typename T, int N> // expected-error{{too many template parameters}}
+void A<T*, 2>::f0() { }
+
+template<typename T, int N>
+void A<T, N>::f1() { } // expected-error{{out-of-line definition}}
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class.spec/temp.class.spec.mfunc/p1.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class.spec/temp.class.spec.mfunc/p1.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..87e21e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.class.spec/temp.class.spec.mfunc/p1.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+template<typename T, int N>
+struct A;
+
+template<typename T>
+struct A<T*, 2> {
+  A(T);
+  ~A();
+  
+  void f(T*);
+  
+  operator T*();
+  
+  static T value;
+};
+
+template<class X> void A<X*, 2>::f(X*) { }
+
+template<class X> X A<X*, 2>::value;
+
+template<class X> A<X*, 2>::A(X) { value = 0; }
+
+template<class X> A<X*, 2>::~A() { }
+
+template<class X> A<X*, 2>::operator X*() { return 0; }