diff options
author | Zancanaro; Carlo <czan8762@plang3.cs.usyd.edu.au> | 2012-09-24 09:58:17 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Zancanaro; Carlo <czan8762@plang3.cs.usyd.edu.au> | 2012-09-24 09:58:17 +1000 |
commit | 222e2a7620e6520ffaf4fc4e69d79c18da31542e (patch) | |
tree | 7bfbc05bfa3b41c8f9d2e56d53a0bc3e310df239 /clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.expl.spec/p1.cpp | |
parent | 3d206f03985b50beacae843d880bccdc91a9f424 (diff) |
Add the clang library to the repo (with some of my changes, too).
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.expl.spec/p1.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.expl.spec/p1.cpp | 99 |
1 files changed, 99 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.expl.spec/p1.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.expl.spec/p1.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3843c0d --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.expl.spec/p1.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s + +// This test creates cases where implicit instantiations of various entities +// would cause a diagnostic, but provides expliict specializations for those +// entities that avoid the diagnostic. The intent is to verify that +// implicit instantiations do not occur (because the explicit specialization +// is used instead). +struct NonDefaultConstructible { + NonDefaultConstructible(int); +}; + + +// C++ [temp.expl.spec]p1: +// An explicit specialization of any of the following: + +// -- function template +template<typename T> void f0(T) { + T t; +} + +template<> void f0(NonDefaultConstructible) { } + +void test_f0(NonDefaultConstructible NDC) { + f0(NDC); +} + +// -- class template +template<typename T> +struct X0 { + static T member; + + void f1(T t) { + t = 17; + } + + struct Inner : public T { }; + + template<typename U> + struct InnerTemplate : public T { }; + + template<typename U> + void ft1(T t, U u); +}; + +template<typename T> +template<typename U> +void X0<T>::ft1(T t, U u) { + t = u; +} + +template<typename T> T X0<T>::member; + +template<> struct X0<void> { }; +X0<void> test_X0; + + +// -- member function of a class template +template<> void X0<void*>::f1(void *) { } + +void test_spec(X0<void*> xvp, void *vp) { + xvp.f1(vp); +} + +// -- static data member of a class template +template<> +NonDefaultConstructible X0<NonDefaultConstructible>::member = 17; + +NonDefaultConstructible &get_static_member() { + return X0<NonDefaultConstructible>::member; +} + +// -- member class of a class template +template<> +struct X0<void*>::Inner { }; + +X0<void*>::Inner inner0; + +// -- member class template of a class template +template<> +template<> +struct X0<void*>::InnerTemplate<int> { }; + +X0<void*>::InnerTemplate<int> inner_template0; + +// -- member function template of a class template +template<> +template<> +void X0<void*>::ft1(void*, const void*) { } + +void test_func_template(X0<void *> xvp, void *vp, const void *cvp) { + xvp.ft1(vp, cvp); +} + +// example from the standard: +template<class T> class stream; +template<> class stream<char> { /* ... */ }; +template<class T> class Array { /* ... */ }; +template<class T> void sort(Array<T>& v) { /* ... */ } +template<> void sort<char*>(Array<char*>&) ; |