From 222e2a7620e6520ffaf4fc4e69d79c18da31542e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Zancanaro; Carlo" Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:58:17 +1000 Subject: Add the clang library to the repo (with some of my changes, too). --- .../dcl.init.ref/p5-cxx0x-no-extra-copy.cpp | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 clang/test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.ref/p5-cxx0x-no-extra-copy.cpp (limited to 'clang/test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.ref/p5-cxx0x-no-extra-copy.cpp') diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.ref/p5-cxx0x-no-extra-copy.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.ref/p5-cxx0x-no-extra-copy.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..27eb6d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/CXX/dcl.decl/dcl.init/dcl.init.ref/p5-cxx0x-no-extra-copy.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s + +// C++03 requires that we check for a copy constructor when binding a +// reference to a reference-compatible rvalue, since we are allowed to +// make a copy. C++0x does not permit the copy, so ensure that we +// don't diagnose cases where the copy constructor is unavailable. + +struct X1 { + X1(); + explicit X1(const X1&); +}; + +struct X2 { + X2(); + +private: + X2(const X2&); +}; + +struct X3 { + X3(); + +private: + X3(X3&); +}; + +template +T get_value_badly() { + double *dp = 0; + T *tp = dp; + return T(); +} + +template +struct X4 { + X4(); + X4(const X4&, T = get_value_badly()); +}; + +void g1(const X1&); +void g2(const X2&); +void g3(const X3&); +void g4(const X4&); + +void test() { + g1(X1()); + g2(X2()); + g3(X3()); + g4(X4()); +} + +// Check that unavailable copy constructors do not cause SFINAE failures. +template struct int_c { }; + +template T f(const T&); + +template +int &g(int_c * = 0); // expected-note{{candidate function [with T = X3]}} + +template float &g(); // expected-note{{candidate function [with T = X3]}} + +void h() { + float &fp = g(); // expected-error{{call to 'g' is ambiguous}} +} -- cgit v1.2.3