From 222e2a7620e6520ffaf4fc4e69d79c18da31542e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Zancanaro; Carlo" Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:58:17 +1000 Subject: Add the clang library to the repo (with some of my changes, too). --- .../basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p1.cpp | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp | 30 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+) create mode 100644 clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p1.cpp create mode 100644 clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp (limited to 'clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref') diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p1.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p1.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c207283 --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p1.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fdiagnostics-show-option -verify %s + +// C++98 [basic.lookup.classref]p1: +// In a class member access expression (5.2.5), if the . or -> token is +// immediately followed by an identifier followed by a <, the identifier must +// be looked up to determine whether the < is the beginning of a template +// argument list (14.2) or a less-than operator. The identifier is first +// looked up in the class of the object expression. If the identifier is not +// found, it is then looked up in the context of the entire postfix-expression +// and shall name a class or function template. If the lookup in the class of +// the object expression finds a template, the name is also looked up in the +// context of the entire postfix-expression and +// -- if the name is not found, the name found in the class of the object +// expression is used, otherwise +// -- if the name is found in the context of the entire postfix-expression +// and does not name a class template, the name found in the class of the +// object expression is used, otherwise +// -- if the name found is a class template, it must refer to the same +// entity as the one found in the class of the object expression, +// otherwise the program is ill-formed. + +// From PR 7247 +template +struct set{}; // expected-note{{lookup from the current scope refers here}} +struct Value { + template + void set(T value) {} // expected-note{{lookup in the object type 'Value' refers here}} + + void resolves_to_same() { + Value v; + v.set(3.2); + } +}; +void resolves_to_different() { + { + Value v; + // The fact that the next line is a warning rather than an error is an + // extension. + v.set(3.2); // expected-warning{{lookup of 'set' in member access expression is ambiguous; using member of 'Value'}} + } + { + int set; // Non-template. + Value v; + v.set(3.2); + } +} + +namespace rdar9915664 { + struct A { + template void a(); + }; + + struct B : A { }; + + struct C : A { }; + + struct D : B, C { + A &getA() { return static_cast(*this); } + + void test_a() { + getA().a(); + } + }; +} + +namespace PR11856 { + template T end(T); + + template + void Foo() { + T it1; + if (it1->end < it1->end) { + } + } + + template T *end(T*); + + class X { }; + template + void Foo2() { + T it1; + if (it1->end < it1->end) { + } + + X *x; + if (x->end < 7) { // expected-error{{no member named 'end' in 'PR11856::X'}} + } + } +} diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cd7e669 --- /dev/null +++ b/clang/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s + +// C++0x [basic.lookup.classref]p3: +// If the unqualified-id is ~type-name, the type-name is looked up in the +// context of the entire postfix-expression. If the type T of the object +// expression is of a class type C, the type-name is also looked up in the +// scope of class C. At least one of the lookups shall find a name that +// refers to (possibly cv-qualified) T. + +// From core issue 305 +struct A { +}; + +struct C { + struct A {}; + void f (); +}; + +void C::f () { + ::A *a; + a->~A (); +} + +// From core issue 414 +struct X {}; +void f() { + X x; + struct X {}; + x.~X(); +} -- cgit v1.2.3