summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m')
-rw-r--r--clang/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m146
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m b/clang/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0aff8e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,experimental.core -analyzer-store=region -analyzer-constraints=range -verify -fblocks %s -analyzer-eagerly-assume
+
+// Delta-reduced header stuff (needed for test cases).
+typedef signed char BOOL;
+typedef unsigned int NSUInteger;
+typedef struct _NSZone NSZone;
+@class NSInvocation, NSMethodSignature, NSCoder, NSString, NSEnumerator;
+@protocol NSObject - (BOOL)isEqual:(id)object;
+- (oneway void)release;
+@end @protocol NSCopying - (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone;
+@end @protocol NSMutableCopying - (id)mutableCopyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone;
+@end @protocol NSCoding - (void)encodeWithCoder:(NSCoder *)aCoder;
+@end @interface NSObject <NSObject> {}
++ (id)alloc;
+- (id)init;
+@end typedef struct {}
+NSFastEnumerationState;
+@protocol NSFastEnumeration - (NSUInteger)countByEnumeratingWithState:(NSFastEnumerationState *)state objects:(id *)stackbuf count:(NSUInteger)len;
+@end @interface NSArray : NSObject <NSCopying, NSMutableCopying, NSCoding, NSFastEnumeration> - (NSUInteger)count;
+@end @interface NSMutableArray : NSArray - (void)addObject:(id)anObject;
+- (BOOL)isEqualToString:(NSString *)aString;
+@end @interface NSAutoreleasePool : NSObject {}
+- (void)drain;
+- (id)init;
+@end
+
+// This test case tests that (x != 0) is eagerly evaluated before stored to
+// 'y'. This test case complements recoverCastedSymbol (see below) because
+// the symbolic expression is stored to 'y' (which is a short instead of an
+// int). recoverCastedSymbol() only recovers path-sensitivity when the
+// symbolic expression is literally the branch condition.
+//
+void handle_assign_of_condition(int x) {
+ // The cast to 'short' causes us to lose symbolic constraint.
+ short y = (x != 0);
+ char *p = 0;
+ if (y) {
+ // This should be infeasible.
+ if (!(x != 0)) {
+ *p = 1; // no-warning
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// From <rdar://problem/6619921>
+//
+// In this test case, 'needsAnArray' is a signed char. The analyzer tracks
+// a symbolic value for this variable, but in the branch condition it is
+// promoted to 'int'. Currently the analyzer doesn't reason well about
+// promotions of symbolic values, so this test case tests the logic in
+// 'recoverCastedSymbol()' (GRExprEngine.cpp) to test that we recover
+// path-sensitivity and use the symbol for 'needsAnArray' in the branch
+// condition.
+//
+void handle_symbolic_cast_in_condition(void) {
+ NSAutoreleasePool* pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];
+
+ BOOL needsAnArray = [@"aString" isEqualToString:@"anotherString"];
+ NSMutableArray* array = needsAnArray ? [[NSMutableArray alloc] init] : 0;
+ if(needsAnArray)
+ [array release];
+
+ [pool drain];
+}
+
+// From PR 3836 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3836)
+//
+// In this test case, the double '!' works fine with our symbolic constraints,
+// but we don't support comparing SymConstraint != SymConstraint. By eagerly
+// assuming the truth of !!a or !!b, we can compare these values directly.
+//
+void pr3836(int *a, int *b) {
+ if (!!a != !!b) /* one of them is NULL */
+ return;
+ if (!a && !b) /* both are NULL */
+ return;
+
+ *a = 1; // no-warning
+ *b = 1; // no-warning
+}
+
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// <rdar://problem/7342806>
+// This false positive occurred because the symbolic constraint on a short was
+// not maintained via sign extension. The analyzer doesn't properly handle
+// the sign extension, but now tracks the constraint. This particular
+// case relies on -analyzer-eagerly-assume because of the expression
+// 'Flag1 != Count > 0'.
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+void rdar7342806_aux(short x);
+
+void rdar7342806() {
+ extern short Count;
+ extern short Flag1;
+
+ short *Pointer = 0;
+ short Flag2 = !!Pointer; // Flag2 is false (0).
+ short Ok = 1;
+ short Which;
+
+ if( Flag1 != Count > 0 )
+ // Static analyzer skips this so either
+ // Flag1 is true and Count > 0
+ // or
+ // Flag1 is false and Count <= 0
+ Ok = 0;
+
+ if( Flag1 != Flag2 )
+ // Analyzer skips this so Flag1 and Flag2 have the
+ // same value, both are false because Flag2 is false. And
+ // from that we know Count must be <= 0.
+ Ok = 0;
+
+ for( Which = 0;
+ Which < Count && Ok;
+ Which++ )
+ // This statement can only execute if Count > 0 which can only
+ // happen when Flag1 and Flag2 are both true and Flag2 will only
+ // be true when Pointer is not NULL.
+ rdar7342806_aux(*Pointer); // no-warning
+}
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// PR 5627 - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5627
+// This test case depends on using -analyzer-eagerly-assume and
+// -analyzer-store=region. The '-analyzer-eagerly-assume' causes the path
+// to bifurcate when evaluating the function call argument, and a state
+// caching bug in GRExprEngine::CheckerVisit (and friends) caused the store
+// to 'p' to not be evaluated along one path, but then an autotransition caused
+// the path to keep on propagating with 'p' still set to an undefined value.
+// We would then get a bogus report of returning uninitialized memory.
+// Note: CheckerVisit mistakenly cleared an existing node, and the cleared
+// node was resurrected by GRStmtNodeBuilder::~GRStmtNodeBuilder(), where
+// 'p' was not assigned.
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+float *pr5627_f(int y);
+
+float *pr5627_g(int x) {
+ float *p;
+ p = pr5627_f(!x);
+ return p; // no-warning
+}
+