clojure-sql, branch master A DSL to create SQL queries in Clojure with an emphasis on composability and abstraction. http://onix.zancanaro.id.au/Archive/clojure-sql/atom?h=master 2013-11-24T14:41:33Z Fix the jdbc query executor for insert/update/delete operations 2013-11-24T14:41:33Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-24T14:41:33Z urn:sha1:13eecd8c0772906318e9fa3b0cf752fc960319c3 Remove a stupid testing thing, update the README a touch 2013-11-24T14:18:19Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-24T14:18:19Z urn:sha1:fe1a2f5ef652cb943be14982f31b3ad236d00629 Add a 'distinct' operator - still a bug to fix on renaming 2013-11-24T14:13:11Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-24T14:13:11Z urn:sha1:2746c6b08b878190ee7c54a7414bf444c660ff1e Fix the database type detection in the jdbc executor 2013-11-12T06:18:00Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-12T06:18:00Z urn:sha1:a2aabf7b89da6313c3b47e603a2668d55ad946b7 Potentially misleading typo 2013-11-12T06:05:56Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-12T06:05:56Z urn:sha1:b99379ed94d7c4f2ae9dc208a2d322632f2898f0 Change the query executor model: now it's query local and the interface is managed by a protocol. 2013-11-12T05:58:44Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-12T05:58:44Z urn:sha1:fe513564989d9151a79d5494f2958ae190c20d02 Fix a minor error in the README. 2013-11-11T23:30:42Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-11T23:30:42Z urn:sha1:1685984030a9d1cd588196d9e2cf648e57034f72 Ah, screw it. Have super long lines in the README. 2013-11-11T23:29:16Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-11T23:29:16Z urn:sha1:fa9e624f4ce94207a07d740fd5db05c068ce8b7f Fix up the README which I formatted wrong. Whoops! 2013-11-11T23:28:12Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-11T23:28:12Z urn:sha1:d4e7fd255ef26ffd24e356b369a6442eadeb6f33 Fix grouping - it used to allow for groupings leaving a non-grouped field 2013-11-11T23:21:53Z Carlo Zancanaro carlo@clearboxsystems.com.au 2013-11-11T23:21:53Z urn:sha1:3ea93238b71eb1af0bdfcbab4559c9a6734944e7 Now it takes a third "projection" argument in which one can perform aggregate function over the existing fields. The fields of the resulting query are the union of the grouping fields and the projected fields (with the projected fields taking precedence). If you try to project a field without applying some sort of function to it then you'll get an exception, but at the moment no function calls are actually validated as aggregate functions (in order to do so we'd need a knowledge of all the aggregate functions, which isn't possible in general).